PHAR MA
processing
BLOG We suspect that somewhere around the Stone Age, our African ancestors learned to do something that would change the evo- lutionary cycle of humanity: they learned to control fire. I can’t imagine the look on the Neanderthal woman’s face when she came across her first fire. It must have been quite a terrifying rush. And yet,
soon after, she stepped closer and closer to the flame, until she touched it and
then learned to re-create it to do unbelievable things.
Not without its brimstone, fire has surely cost humanity a “not so insignif-
icant” amount of pain and suffering over the last six million years, but in the
end, we would clearly be remiss not to respect the impact of it on evolution,
history, and human survival.
When viewing civilization over its impressive time scale, perhaps biotechnol-
ogy has become “the fire” of the next human era. After all, biology is not new.
It has always been here, it is dangerous and it is difficult to manage, predict,
and understand. We are learning to control biology to create warmth, energy,
and renewal, and for better or worse, it will surely have an evolutionary impact
on migration, population, and diversity. Its power and significance could be a
beginning and/or an end to many things.
As with many sciences, there are decades of debate about biotechnology
(clarification: except beer—no one complains about beer) and its place in the
new world. Many things in nature have an element of perfection to them that
are so far beyond human understanding that it hurts the psyche to comprehend.
As only a very small part of nature, who are we as humans to make changes to
something so perfect as biology or fire?
Well, it is clearly not a choice we can make. It is too interesting to avoid and
now that can see the unseen and it is ending, aiding, extending, and saving
the lives of both human and animal alike, we have made fire and it’s burning in
every part of this planet. If anyone thinks that the technology around biotech-
nology is isolated to certain world civilizations, it is time to reboot; it is a global
curiosity and an incalculable force. Scientific-minded people all over the world
are culturing, experimenting on, testing, injecting, digesting, and even snorting
biotechnology.
Not unlike our ancestors who undoubtedly fought the merits
and utilization of fire, we would be in real trouble if we didn’t
continue to question something as powerful as biotechnology
and how it is being deployed. We must respect the rights of all
things in nature to avoid corrupting them, and biotechnology is
perhaps one of the most profound examples of all time where
this sentiment should be applied. There are good and reason-
able arguments on every side of biotechnology.
I am often confronted socially with the question of what I do
for a living. The ensuing conversation of me being a process
architect that designs biotechnology facilities for drug produc-
tion (yatta, yatta, yatta) is rarely one that the questioner has
the attention span or willingness to stick around to hear the
end of. I often wonder whether it’s my choice of social circle,
awkward social skills, or my delivery. Perhaps in the future,
maybe I’ll just say, “I make fire.” ■
◗ By: Tom Piombino, P.E., Process Architect at IPS –
Integrated Project Services, LLC
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Zoom level
fit page
fit width
A
A
fullscreen
one page
two pages
share
print
download
SlideShow
fullscreen
in this issue
search
back issues
help
Click to subscribe to this magazine
Open Article
Open Article
Close Article
article text for page
< previous story
|
next story >
Share this page with a friend
Save to “My Stuff”
Subscribe to this magazine
Search
Help
